![]() ![]() ![]() I think we should have points for PRs as was discussed earlier in the year because it is the one area of Wikipedia that seems to be left behind from all the others and often gets neglected. J Milburn ( talk) 08:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC) Reply There's something very, very perverse about the idea that someone who is producing a lot of high quality content must be a "spam"er or in some other way problematic. This competition's FP specialists are very well-thought-of at FPC. Nergaal, I'm not clear why you feel that any user is causing a problem at the FPC project, which is what happened at the DYK project.Nergaal ( talk) 21:01, 31 August 2014 (UTC) Reply As a beginning, I think sets should be devalued. This is happening again with FPs, and is reminiscent of what happened with Durova many years ago (although she seemed to have more variety). The spirit of the competition was broken in the past when one user would flood DYK with noms and I think he either won or was close to winning.J Milburn ( talk) 17:37, 31 August 2014 (UTC) Reply Feel free to start subsections as appropriate, but they are not essential. The polls can then be closed by the judges. It's that time again! Every year, WikiCup rules are tweaked and adjusted, so: what works? What doesn't work? What do you want to see? What do you want to to stop seeing? Do points need to be adjusted? Do we need new rules/methods for running the competition? This initial thread is for throwing around some ideas, after which time I will create some straw polls with possible changes to gauge feelings. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |